Day 3- Allies vs “allies” and no one is winning

We are now entering day 3 of Turkey advancing into Syria.  Both sides are experiencing costly losses and still, the battle rages on.  On Friday, the US said they were pulling out of Northeast Syria and subsequently, Turkey stated they would begin to enter Syria supposedly to help “neutralize” ISIS/ISIL threats.

Well, from what we have seen, the only thing Turkey has done in Syria is start a battle with the Kurdish and SDF.  Turkey came in and immediately began using heavy arms fire.  This is something we were afraid of happening, and if you watched, we talked about it on Monday’s American Grit Live.

One news report (article here) said Turkey initially wanted to assist with getting Syrian refugees back into Syria.  Yet this current fight has actually caused over 100,000 displaced Syrian and Kurdish residents so far.  Now, even Pakistan is attempting to back Turkey.

The events unfolding in Syria, because of Turkey’s advance, is not doing any good in the fight against ISIS whatsoever.  In fact, there are several reports of ISIS detainees getting released because of bombings.  There are even ISIS women who are starting riots in the area.  But Turkey is supposed to be a United States ally, especially because they are also a part of NATO.  Even if you are not big on the politics of it all, this whole thing seems a little sketchy.

So far, the US has continued to stay out of it, with Special Forces representatives even telling media sources (article reference here ) how wrong this move is.  We are simply watching on the sidelines across the country.

Should we step in and risk American troops’ lives?  Who’s side should we be on?  If we pick a side, where does that put us strategically?  While we here at American Grit know exactly where we stand, we are curious to what our audience thinks.

BREAKING EDIT @ 406pm 11October: Newsweek and multiple articles stating Turkey has “accidentally” bombed US Special Forces troops in Kobani and we STILL did not return fire since they are Allies. Uh, excuse YOU Turkey!

What side would YOU choose and why?  What would be the strategic benefits?  Drop a comment and let us know!




Editor’s Note: We know our referenced articles are Fox and Al Jazeera.  We also read articles by CNN, NBC, the UK Independent and many, many others over the last few days.  We get our ideas, references, etc. from multiple sources in an attempt to provide logical and educated stances. Have a problem with it? We don’t care.

Know what we're sayin fam?

Average rating 4.6 / 5. Vote count: 20

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.


5 thoughts on “Day 3- Allies vs “allies” and no one is winning”

  1. Avatar

    What was the mission of the American forces in Syria to begin with and what strategy was in place to accomplish it. It does seem that abruptly removing our troops was never in the plan to begin with so how can that be explained on a non-political but tactical level and how do we benefit from it? Semper Fidelis

  2. Avatar

    This is not a taking sides type of situation. What must be done is to direct Turkish forces into the areas that have isis/isil elements and forces. By utilizing the American forces presence as a buffer and still operate. Simultaneously bring UN peace keepers in this region for reintegrating refugees. Pointing
    both sides to their “objective” of removing insurgentS and bringing back Syrian nationals to their homes. It’s not 1st grade politics of choose a side. It’s Jr high politics. Now you got to get your goth friends to get along with your cheerleader friends

    1. Avatar
      Charlotte Reavis

      Completely agree with you, unfortunately that is not the case. Hopefully the situation changes soon for the better. It will be interesting to see what direction we end up taking, but it looks like we are just rolling out altogether.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *